THE EXTENSIVE CONSPIRACY
Evolution has many problems. We mean beyond not being true. Several prominent Creationist thinkers have pointed out that it is
Evolution has many problems. We mean beyond not being true. Several prominent
Creationist thinkers have pointed out that it isa religion, and cannot be disproven. Almost to a man, they have also generously gone on and provided a great deal evidence that disproves Evolutionary Theory.
The problem extends well beyond just teaching a mistruth to our children. The ramifications of Evolutionism extend in many directions. Many research efforts and commercial applications DEPEND on the Theory. Constant attention must be paid to ensure that there is never the least little hint of discrepancy. Just one small problem with the evidence or application will be the magic bullet that takes it down. So much energy is expended on making sure each part fits together it must eventually fail.
When you consider the size of the conspiracy required, it makes the Satanic and Liberal conspiracies against Christianity look like children telling dirty jokes in a (public) school playground!
The conspiracy must protect the dogma, direct research and ensure conclusions in many disciplines. In addition, many commercial organizations found their industries on evolutionary principles. The following are some of the topics affected in any way by evolution, either in defining it, measuring it, validating it or using it:
Which would require a conspiracy to include or affect:
Admittedly, not all of these conspirators are required to defend the basic theory of biological evolution. Some are merely corollary endeavors where information and results dovetail with the misinformation provided by Darwin's disciples. For example, the fact that recorded history 12 extends back 6243 years is not a problem unless your literal interpretation of the Old Testament places Creation 6034 years ago. If the method of Fossil Distribution depends on The Great Flood, no Flood evidence can be tolerated in Geology, Archaeology, Anthropology, the Arctic Ice layers, Tree Rings, and the above mentioned Historic Record. And if micro-evolution is factual, some parts of the conspiracy may be sincere. This would provide a 'legitimate cover' in the manner of the Mafia, or television newscasts.
Ultimately, one of the competingTruths of Young Earth Creationism, Old Earth Creationism and Intelligent Design will be proven out as the True story. Somewhere in the vast, interconnected, interlocking, self-vindicating map of Evolution Science is a line that marks the difference between Fact and Fiction.
All it will take is one of the above professionals stepping forward, with proof, and announcing the extent of the conspiracy. Or, an amateur working outside of his/her area finding unauthorized proof. Or exposing the hoaxes.
1Bacteria, with human DNA installed, is made to produce insulin that is supposedly useful in the treatment of humans. An industry exists to support the idea that our DNA, in E. Coli cells, will produce insulin that closely matches a medicine produced in our organs. This source of 'germ insulin' accounts for a mere 95-98% of the insulin used in America.
2Many diseases have developed resistance to drugs like penicillin. If it were a genetic resistance, it would imply the addition of drug-resistance-related information, which violates many versions of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Much more likely is the idea that God imparted many human diseases with an initial vulnerability to a material found in bread mold. Some other mechanism imparts a resistance to this divine vulnerability over time.
3In addition, the speed at which diseases adapt to chemicals that never existed on the planet before certainly seems on first look to be an addition of information. This addition is more of the evolutionary 'New Math.'
4For example, the distribution of monotremes in and around Australia, marsupials in Australia and the Americas is implicit in the evolutionary theory.
5If anyone finds a distinct ecology of large placental animals in the outback, evolutionists will have a lot of backtracking ahead.
6If we're not related to other animals, the medical research results gained have little or no application in human subjects, other than coincidences of tissue type. The range of experiments probably have no good reason for being performed. Beneficiaries of such research should be informed they might not have been properly healed.
7If we're not related to other animals, we're just aggravating them for no good reason.
8Ken Hovind has stated that "the possum, the redwood tree and the kidney bean all have 22 chromosomes" And that "The average scientist can't tell the difference. They've got 22 chromosomes - all three of them." Geneticists working for the FBI, each State BI, other Law and paternity enforcement organizations will have to jimmy up an explanation for how DNA is useful in courts of law to distinguish between one out of a few billion individuals, but useless to distinguish between completely different species.
9If we're not related to other animals, we're just torturing them for no good reason.
10The finding of the Coelacanth, living fossil, should have been very embarrassing to 'real' scientists.
11Ken Hovind has 20,000 instances of anecdotal evidence of dinosaurs and other 'extinct' animals that have been seen. If any real evidence appears, his cause will be greatly enhanced.
12The first recorded year that can be accurately placed in relation to modern times: 4241 BC. To Go To The WELCOME Mat